Age Pension means-test prevents rational decision-making
Rules exempting the family home from the Age Pension means test are preventing retirees from make rational housing decision, the Actuaries Institute believes.
The institute's green paper, ‘Unlocking Housing Wealth — options to meet retirement needs', reported that Australian retirees had the second lowest income levels of OECD countries.
Speaking to Money Management, Catherine Nance, the convenor of the Actuaries Institute's working group who published the green paper, called on the Government to break down barriers preventing people from accessing equity from their homes in retirement.
"The major stop on them making decisions is the Age Pension means test, because the house being the only exempt asset, if you want to sell it and go into a smaller place or an independent living unit, or if you want to access it through a financial product like a reverse mortgage, anything you release from your home potentially gets caught up in the Age Pension means test and can reduce the Age Pension you're getting," she said.
"We felt there was a case to be made for saying rather than just forcing people to stay in their homes beyond the time when it's appropriate, why don't we allow a partial protection up to a certain limit from the Age Pension means testing for amounts accessed by older people when they sell down or access equity through their house?"
Nance also suggested that a "first time buyers" style exemption from stamp duty would also encourage retirees to access equity from their homes, and give them "a better quality of life".
"At that point in age a lot of people don't want to just pay $30,000 to the state government in stamp duty, which is like a dead tax, simply to move to a slightly smaller house, so we feel there is a case for looking at stamp duty relief for older people," she said.
Homesafe Solutions managing director, Peter Szabo, welcomed the Actuaries Institute papers, describing the issues as the "elephant in the room".
"The family home is quite literally the elephant in the room and government can no longer ignore the issue with Australia having the highest proportion of home ownership amongst seniors in the developed world," he said.
"Assisting senior Australians to address the very real challenges of funding their lives in retirement needs to be acknowledged as a priority and decision makers must support options to allow retirees access to the equity in their homes."
by Nicholas O'Donoghue
17 March 2016
moneymanagement.com.au
Latest Newsletters
Hot Issues
- Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
- Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
- ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
- The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
- The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
- Three things to consider when switching your super
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Illegal access nets $637 million
- Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
- Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
- Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
- Planning financially for a career break
- Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
- Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
- Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
- Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
- Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
- Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
- Super literacy low for cash-strapped
- Four timeless principles for investing success
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
- Wheat Production by Country
- Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
- Millions of Australians lose by leaving savings in default MySuper funds
Article archive
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
April - June 2016 archive
- Making investing a family affair
- Super and divorce: a personal finance issue
- Market Update - May 2016
- ASIC flags SMSF investors in scam risk
- Older, greyer and still working
- Working and contributing to super past 65
- The pitfalls of part-year pensions
- Replenishing SMSF memberships
- Budget will hit 15% of SMSFs
- The insidious side of low interest rates
- Market Update - April 2016
- Budget 2016-17
- Do investment principles stand test of time?
- Estate Planning - early inheritance
- US economy will bend, not break
- A detailed look at the ATO’s new LRBA guidance
- Defying life's blueprint
- ATO continuing lodgement crackdown
- Another twist on the gender savings gap
- Market Update – March 2016
- Going solo
- Use our online budgeting tools to help plan your future.
- Age Pension means-test prevents rational decision-making
- Changing times for super collectables
- Preservation Age Rule
- Why investing for retirement isn't just about super