Fresh SMSF documentation warnings surface
One lawyer has observed "significant" and increasing issues arising from SMSF documents that were not properly executed, resulting in "serious consequences" for the end client.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Arnold Bloch Leibler partner Clint Harding said the rise of automatically generated documentation has seen crucial details left out of the compliance process.
For example, these systems often do not take into account the details of the trust deed, which is increasingly resulting in problems with certain tax structures.
"I’ve got one on the go at the moment where trust distributions have been made for seven years to a company that has been wound up. So you see some strange things," Mr Harding added.
"There can be some pretty serious consequences if you distribute, or purport to distribute, income to a beneficiary who is either dead or has been wound up, that’s going to be ineligible and avoid distribution, and presumably that income will be taxed to the trustee at 49 per cent," he said.
Mr Harding said typically there isn’t a sinister element to these failures, rather, just holes in the compliance process.
"People just use last year’s documentation and change the date on it and away you go," he said.
Gadens partner Kathleen Conroy previously noted to SMSF Adviser the inherent danger in speedy access to important SMSF documentation.
"For the SMSF sector, modern technology enables, amongst other things, the setting up of funds in less than 15 minutes, the making and changing of investments in less time than it takes 'to boil the kettle’, and the gathering and disseminating of more words than any one person could read in a lifetime," she said.
"Speed, a lightened management load and access to information are not inherently evil – but in the world of self-managed super they are inherently dangerous," she added.
"The SMSF trustee can definitely benefit from the proper use of modern technology. But the SMSF trustee is legally bound to be engaged with the fund, to be thinking about long-term goals, and to be responding to individual circumstances rather than group trends," she said.
"There is an inherent tension between these legal drivers and the potentials of modern technology. If not properly respected, this tension can lead to real pain for the trustee and the assets of the fund."
By Katarina Taurian
Monday, 20 June
smsfadviseronline.com.au
Latest Newsletters
Hot Issues
- Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
- Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
- ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
- The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
- The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
- Three things to consider when switching your super
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Illegal access nets $637 million
- Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
- Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
- Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
- Planning financially for a career break
- Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
- Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
- Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
- Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
- Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
- Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
- Super literacy low for cash-strapped
- Four timeless principles for investing success
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
- Wheat Production by Country
- Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
- Millions of Australians lose by leaving savings in default MySuper funds
- Vanguard economic and market outlook for 2024: A return to sound money
- An investment year of ups and downs
- How to tame the market's skewness
- The Countries that Export the Most Wine in the World
- Tips for preparing for the best tax outcomes
Article archive
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
July - September 2016 archive
- The gymnastics of keeping your portfolio balanced
- Market Update – August 2016
- Stop!! Don't do a paper Budget, use our online budgeting tools instead.
- Advisers the key to retirement stability, research shows
- The toughest tasks for self-managed super
- Lawyer warns on ‘adverse’ death taxes with insurance
- Don't get distracted by super changes
- A savings mirage?
- Market Update - July 2016
- The three biggest economic issues likely to affect markets in 2016
- SMSFs warned on looming property ‘tough times’
- Diversification counts when uncertainty beckons
- Strong economic data stablises markets
- Starting a super pension in 2016-17?
- Market Update - June 2016
- ATO extends looming SuperStream deadline
- ATO's deadline for review non-arm's length LRBAs extended
- A paradoxical relationship: The self-employed and super
- Fresh SMSF documentation warnings surface