Women still in the dark about finances
The gender pay gap and divorce were some of the issues that were stopping women from understanding how to thrive financially, according to AFA Inspire national chair Dianne Charman.
Speaking at her first roadshow, Charman said 64 per cent of women “didn’t feel they understood the financial language” and added how rearing kids, carer duties and time away from the workforce were “some of the things that keep her awake”.
The 20-year industry veteran provided insights from the latest research on the cost of divorce, the retirement gap and the impact of financial bullying. She also made a case for planning during the pre-separation, separation and divorce stages.
The pay gap remained a key topic of conversation, with Charman saying the gap currently sat at 16 per cent and 33 per cent at an executive level.
She said women avoided talking about finances at the beginning of a relationship, however, she believed that was the most crucial time to enter into that discussion “as one in three marriages end in divorce and the time from separation to divorce is three-and-a-half years on average”.
“Wealth took five years to recover from the impact of a divorce, with 66.4 per cent of income going to household necessities,” she said.
A large share of the budget was spent on alcohol and cigarettes to deal with the stress, she added.
The roadshow opened with an address from Association of Financial Advisers chief executive Philip Kewin, who said the aim of the event was to encourage more women to become advisers.
Kewin said the AFA recognised the success of thought leaders by “bringing to the fore those professionals who lead the way”.
The Inspire program was launched in 2013, with the number of women in the AFA membership increasing by nearly 30 per cent since then.
In a live poll at the event, guests were asked if they thought advisers could shorten the five-year recovery time frame for clients who were divorcing and if lawyers and advisers could collaborate to achieve the same outcome. Both answers received a majority yes verdict.
By Megan Tran
25 May 2017
www.financialobserver.com.au
Latest Newsletters
Hot Issues
- Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
- Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
- ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
- The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
- The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
- Three things to consider when switching your super
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Illegal access nets $637 million
- Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
- Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
- Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
- Planning financially for a career break
- Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
- Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
- Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
- Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
- Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
- Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
- Super literacy low for cash-strapped
- Four timeless principles for investing success
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
- Wheat Production by Country
- Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
- Millions of Australians lose by leaving savings in default MySuper funds
- Vanguard economic and market outlook for 2024: A return to sound money
- An investment year of ups and downs
Article archive
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
April - June 2017 archive
- ‘Bank-like heists’ make way for new wave of cyber crime
- Give your children a saving and investing edge - for life
- Women still in the dark about finances
- Lessons learnt - often the hard way
- Australian population figures
- ATO poised to ramp up focus on key compliance area
- Benefit payments rise dramatically ahead of July 1 super changes
- There's no magic pudding when it comes to super
- ATO guidance provides clarity on death benefit confusion
- Beyond super: Our other personal investment market
- The three core pillars of this year's budget
- Federal Budget - 2017-18 - Overview
- Federal Budget - 2017-18 - Budget documents
- Global economy synchronised and thriving
- Life's financial turning points: good and not-so-good
- 2011 Census - what was the make up of your area?
- ATO set to release guidance targeted for SMSF clients
- More withdrawals from 'the bank of mum and dad'
- Tax headache relief: Here’s more help with pension assets changes
- Most Aussies shun super advice
- Australia in a nutshell
- ATO finalises guidance on transfer balance cap
- Fit for purpose? The super story so far...
- SMSFs urged to review segregation clauses in trust deed
- Big insto addresses CGT misconceptions
- Dollar-cost averaging for millennial investors