Excuses limited for late death benefit payments
The ATO will only recognise limited reasons offered by trustees as an acceptable excuse for not paying a death benefit within the standard timeframe.
A technical manager has warned SMSF trustees the ATO will not accept certain circumstances as a way of explaining why a late death benefit payment was not made within a timeframe that has satisfied the “as soon as practicable” requirement.
Speaking during a recent technical webinar, SuperConcepts executive manager SMSF technical support Nicholas Ali noted trustees have, by accepted standards, approximately six months to payout a death benefit and detailed some common unacceptable reasons as to why this timeframe was not met.
For example, Ali said the ATO would not consider delaying a death benefit payment to get the best market price for an asset as a valid excuse. To this end he predicted in these circumstances the regulator would argue the payment could have been made in-specie to the beneficiary.
Not having sufficient cash in the fund is another reason the ATO would find unacceptable for not paying a death benefit as soon as practicable, Ali added.
“The ATO would say ‘Well, you as trustee have an obligation under the superannuation covenants to make sure that the fund has an investment strategy and that investment strategy would have to make sure that the fund had liquidity for things like paying out death benefits’”.
Ali also identified the personal issues of trustees as being an insufficient reason for not making a death benefit payment on time.
“There’s a private binding ruling that talks about this particular situation…and in the private binding ruling they were legitimate and serious personal issues, but the tax office said no,” he revealed.
“[It said] you as the trustee of a fund, that’s mutually exclusive to what’s going on in your personal life.
“So having personal issues and not being able to administer the fund correctly is in breach of your trustee obligations. That is not an acceptable delay.”
In contrast, Ali acknowledge some situations that present trustees with a legitimate reason for paying the benefit late. These include having to seek professional financial advice before executing the payout, having to determine the validity of a binding death benefit nomination, or not being able to physically locate the beneficiaries.
Tia Thomas
January 14, 2022
smstrusteenews.com.au
Latest Newsletters
Hot Issues
- Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
- Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
- ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
- The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
- The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
- Three things to consider when switching your super
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Illegal access nets $637 million
- Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
- Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
- Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
- Planning financially for a career break
- Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
- Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
- Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
- Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
- Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
- Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
- Super literacy low for cash-strapped
- Four timeless principles for investing success
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
- Wheat Production by Country
- Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
- Millions of Australians lose by leaving savings in default MySuper funds
- Vanguard economic and market outlook for 2024: A return to sound money
- An investment year of ups and downs
Article archive
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
January - March 2022 archive
- Mistakes to avoid when markets are turbulent
- Fresh research challenges guidance on SMSF minimum balances
- GDP by country since 1800
- Risking your retirement
- A total returns approach to rebalancing
- SMSFs still experiencing delays with SuperStream
- APRA proposes updates to super data transparency
- Why investment predications can be likened to weather forecasts
- What to expect in 2022
- Important detail highlighted in legacy pension draft regulations
- Vaccination rates (Dose)
- ‘Catastrophic consequences’: Government lobbied on NALI rules
- ATO releases new guidelines to combat identity theft
- Volatile markets underscore importance of discipline
- Financial burden of COVID sees rise in illegal loans to members
- 6-member SMSFs proving popular for older trustees
- ATO holds off on TBAR compliance
- Bull vs Bear
- One of the most read articles in 2021
- Advisers warned on joint entity hurdles for ‘sophisticated investor’ qualification
- Excuses limited for late death benefit payments