Survey reveals strong opposition to retirement system changes
The majority of Australians are opposed to further changes to the retirement system, despite the rising costs with supporting an ageing population a recent survey has shown.
A survey commissioned by Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand asked more than 1,200 Australian and New Zealand residents on their thoughts about how to create a more sustainable retirement system.
CA ANZ superannuation leader Tony Negline said the results show that the Australian public’s dominant preference is for the status quo to remain in place and that the government pension should be provided with current means testing rules in Australia.
The report indicated considerable disagreement about the preferred policy options for dealing with the increased costs of an ageing population.
The most heavily opposed policy option was across the board reductions to the amount in the amount paid.
The survey revealed that while only 41 per cent of couples and 35 per cent of singles in Australia feel they ‘get by’ on current age pension income levels, only 12 per cent of couples and 12 per cent of singles feel they could live comfortably at that level.
“There was mixed support for the other options, including increasing the age of entitlement, amending how adjustments occur or pre-funding through increased current taxes,” the report said.
The least unpopular option with New Zealanders and Australians across all age groups was the use of income and asset testing, the report said, however even this option was not met with much enthusiasm.
“Interestingly support for asset testing did not extend to including the family home, which was rejected by all grouping differentials — age, gender, income, location, employment status and so on,” the report said.
“Support came through for egalitarian notions of paying through taxation and restricting access to those.”
Mr Negline said politicians are between a “rock and a hard place”.
“The public don’t want change, despite knowing the system will cost significantly more in the future,” he said.
“People clearly want to see the status quo remain and the government pension provided universally without continued means testing in Australia.”
By Staff Reporter
11 May 2018
www.smsfadviser.com
Latest Newsletters
Hot Issues
- Aged care report goes to the heart of Australia’s tax debate
- Removed super no longer protected from creditors: court
- ATO investigating 16.5k SMSFs over valuation compliance
- The 2025 Financial Year Tax & Super Changes You Need to Know!
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2024
- The compounding benefits from reinvesting dividends
- Three things to consider when switching your super
- Oldest Buildings in the World.
- Illegal access nets $637 million
- Trustee decisions are at their own discretion: expert
- Regular reviews and safekeeping of documents vital: expert
- Latest stats back up research into SMSF longevity and returns: educator
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2024
- Planning financially for a career break
- Could your SMSF do with more diversification?
- Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
- Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
- Quarterly reporting regime means communication now paramount: expert
- Plan now to take advantage of 5-year carry forward rule: expert
- Why investors are firmly focused on interest rates
- Super literacy low for cash-strapped
- Four timeless principles for investing success
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2024
- Wheat Production by Country
- Time to start planning for stage 3 tax cuts: technical manager
Article archive
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
April - June 2018 archive
- Assess your retirement financial resources
- Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
- Time to check your risk exposure?
- Some general interest stats on SMSFs
- Survey reveals strong opposition to retirement system changes
- Check trust deed to protect super in estate planning
- Australia by numbers – Update
- Federal Budget 2018 – Overview
- Your Budget
- 4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
- Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
- New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
- Common EOFY slip-ups flagged for SMSFs
- Beware residency rules if moving overseas
- 99 pct of SMSFs missing global opportunities
- How to plan for a better retirement
- Australia by numbers - Update
- Determine your retirement goals
- ATO issues update on cryptocurrency compliance traps
- How likely is a global trade war?
- Gig economy spike prompts calls for super policy changes
- Australia's vital statistics
- What your age should say about your super
- Downsizing requires holistic tax planning
- Millions of multiple super accounts erode savings