A dynamic approach to retiree spending and drawdowns
Here's a critical question for retirees and those nearing retirement: How much are you intending to drawdown and spend each year from your retirement savings?

Here's a critical question for retirees and those nearing retirement: How much are you intending to drawdown and spend each year from your retirement savings?
Historically-low yields, expected muted portfolio returns and growing life expectancies can make this a particularly challenging question.
Many retirees try to balance the competing priorities of maintaining a relatively consistent level of annual spending while increasing or preserving value of their portfolios to finance future income and perhaps other goals such as bequests.
The recently-published Vanguard research paper, From assets to income: A goals-based approach to retirement spending, proposes that retirees consider a dynamic approach to retirement spending and drawdowns.
This is a hybrid of two popular rules-of-thumb – the dollar-plus-inflation rule and the percentage-of-portfolio rule – designed to allow retirees to spend a higher portion of their returns after good market performance while weathering poor markets without significantly cutting spending.
In summary, this dynamic strategy provides for retirees to set flexible ceilings and floors on withdrawals for their annual spending that reflects the performance of the markets and their unique goals.
Popular rules-of-thumb
It's worth briefly discussing the most popular withdrawal and spending rules and their potential drawbacks:
- The dollar-plus-inflation rule. This involves setting a dollar amount to withdraw and spend in the first year of retirement and then increasing that amount annually by the rate of inflation.
- The percentage-of-portfolio rule. This involves withdrawing and spending a set percentage of a portfolio's value each year.
Both rules provide options for retirees to withdraw set percentages or set dollar amounts each year, regardless of how markets are performing.
When markets are poorly performing, retirees using the dollar-plus-inflation rule face a higher risk of spending more than they can afford and depleting their savings. And when markets are performed strongly, these retirees may spend less than they can afford.
With the percentage-of-portfolio rule, a retiree's spending may significantly fluctuate depending on the changing value of a portfolio. This can make budgeting hard, especially for retirees who spend a high proportion of their income on non-discretionary spending such as food and housing.
Floors and ceilings
With the dynamic spending strategy, annual spending is allowed to fluctuate based on market performance. This involves annually calculating a ceiling (a maximum amount) and a floor (a minimum amount) that spending can fluctuate.
For instance, a retiree might set a ceiling of a 5 per cent increase and a floor of a 2.5 per cent decrease in spending from the previous year.
The ceiling is the maximum amount that you are willing to spend while the floor is minimum amount you can tolerate spending.
Of course, many retirees receive a superannuation pension with a mandatory, aged-based minimum withdrawal rate. A dynamic approach will help such retirees calculate how much to reinvest, if any, each year.
Written by Robin Bowerman
Head of Corporate Affairs at Vanguard.
11 September 2018
vanguardinvestments.com.au
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025
- Move assets before death to avoid tax implications
- ATO issues warning about super schemes
- 12 financial tips for the festive season and year ahead
- Birth date impacts bring-forward NCCs
- Countries with the largest collection or eucalyptus trees
- How to budget using the envelope method
- Accountants united in support for changes
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2025
- Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296
- Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy
- Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super
- Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package
- How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history
- How changes to deeming rates could affect your pension payments
- Five building blocks that could lead to a more confident retirement
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2025
- Caution needed if moving assets to children
- Evolution of ‘ageless workers’ sees retirement age rise
- Younger Australians expect more for their retirement
- New NALE guidance still has issues
- Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
- How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding

