Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
The Division 296 impost has prompted SMSF members looking at retaining assets in super to consider the tax impact of their death on their beneficiaries.
.
More SMSF members are looking at the effect of death benefit taxes on their beneficiaries as part of their consideration around whether to move assets out of superannuation to avoid the impact of the proposed Division 296 impost, according to administration provider Heffron.
Heffron managing director Meg Heffron said recent discussions with clients on the Division 296 tax had expanded to include issues such as where to move assets outside of super and estate planning.
“One of the most useful things about Division 296 tax being threatened, even if it’s never introduced, is it’s really focused the mind of a lot of people who have kept money in super because it’s a good tax deal and don’t want to take it out, and the government doesn’t make them take it out anymore,” Heffron said during a recent practitioner briefing.
“What they’re doing is running the gauntlet on death benefit taxes.
“A lot of the conversations I’ve been having with clients about this has been: ‘If I have this tax, which doesn’t necessarily make me worse off in super than outside super, and with that money over $3 million I don’t mind taking it out of super because at least I’m protecting my beneficiaries from that death benefit tax.’”
She said the issue of death benefit taxes arises because if a member moves assets out of superannuation, they are dealt with by the will, but where they are retained in super, they can have an impact on those receiving a death benefit from the fund.
“One of the things that has the biggest detrimental impact on wealth is dying with a whole heap of money in super and no spouse to leave it to,” she said.
“Usually, if there’s no spouse, it’ll end up with adult children or other beneficiaries that are not dependants and they pay very high rates of tax on most death benefits and that will end up dwarfing any Division 296 tax.
“I think in the end, we’ll end up having a very productive discussion about death benefit taxes prompted by something completely different, which is Division 296.”
June 26, 2025
Jason Spits
smsmagazine.com.au
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025
- Move assets before death to avoid tax implications
- ATO issues warning about super schemes
- 12 financial tips for the festive season and year ahead
- Birth date impacts bring-forward NCCs
- Countries with the largest collection or eucalyptus trees
- How to budget using the envelope method
- Accountants united in support for changes
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2025
- Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296
- Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy
- Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super
- Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package
- How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history
- How changes to deeming rates could affect your pension payments
- Five building blocks that could lead to a more confident retirement
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2025
- Caution needed if moving assets to children
- Evolution of ‘ageless workers’ sees retirement age rise
- Younger Australians expect more for their retirement
- New NALE guidance still has issues
- Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
- How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
- Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor
- Investment and economic outlook, August 2025
- New report highlights confusion over BDBNs
- How ‘investment procrastination’ could be hurting your wealth
- ATO warns that SAR lodgments are on its radar
- Compassionate release warning issued
