Two Cautionary Tales About Resources Important to Anyone Using a Domain Name or Website
This warning is new, but the reason for forgetting to renew a domain name isn’t.

1. Not renewing a domain name you want to keep
This warning is new, but the reason for forgetting to renew a domain name isn’t.
Today, a domain name is one of the most important digital assets a practice has, yet far too many practices still risk what happened in this story.
Domains are generally registered for periods of two to five years. During that time, people move on, email addresses are lost, IT support arrangements change, and contact details become outdated. The result is that domain renewal notices can fail to reach the person responsible for the domain.
If a domain expires and is subsequently deregistered, someone else can potentially take ownership of it.
In this case, a practice failed to renew its domain name on time. In the past, it was often possible to renew a domain after it had expired and everything would be OK. That is the part that has changed.
In this instance, GoDaddy took control of the domain after it mistakenly expired. That should still have been recoverable. But this time, the registrar would not allow the practice to renew the domain unless it paid almost $3,000 to ‘buy’ it back.
BEWARE. We have never seen this before. It appears to create a new potential income stream for domain registrars, so make sure you know where your domain records are held and keep a close eye on them.
2. Images used on a website without copyright authorisation
This has been an issue for the past two decades, but it has raised its ugly head again.
The issue concerns copyright ownership of images used on websites. Twice in the past few months, our clients have been contacted by a new player in this area called COPYTRACK.
On both occasions, COPYTRACK wanted our clients to pay several hundred dollars for alleged copyright infringement. While image copyright is important, in these particular cases, we believe the claims are most likely to be unfounded. Each time, the images in question were covered by our Getty Images subscription, which we maintain for our clients to help protect them from copyright infringement claims.
We know of others who have paid up to $2,500 per image to settle similar infringement claims.
In any case, always make sure your website developers are using images appropriately licensed for your use and that you have evidence of that authorisation. This can help protect you from unnecessary copyright claims.
AcctWeb/PlannerWeb
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Two Cautionary Tales About Resources Important to Anyone Using a Domain Name or Website
- Children as SMSF dependents very complex
- The three phases of retirement: Key decisions at every stage
- The retirement gap we don't talk about
- Retirees hardest hit by inflation
- IGR predicts drawdowns will be major source of retirement income
- Complex rules of small business CGT concessions can present challenges
- Check out the smartest species on earth: Data from 200M BC to 2026
- Five steps towards a more confident retirement
- Financial literacy in Australia: Where we're improving (and falling behind)
- CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair
- SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?
- How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise
- Super viewed as mortgage solution
- Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape
- Check out the largest castles by country
- ATO’s LRBA data significantly less than industry figures
- New deeming thresholds could deliver small part age pension
- Can I still get the Age Pension if my super is healthy?
- New to SMSFs? Start preparing for your first SAR lodgment
- Contribution splitting now more valuable
- Six ways Gen X can build retirement savings
- How to maximise the impact of your inheritance
- How Our Diets have Changed.
- Adequate retirement savings misjudged
- The SBSCH will close from 1 July 2026
- Complications of maintaining two cost bases in Div 296
- What the Payday Super changes mean for your retirement
- investment and economic outlook 2026
- Rules apply to gifting in superannuation
Article archive
- July - September 2026
- April - June 2026
- January - March 2026
- October - December 2025
- July - September 2025
- April - June 2025
- January - March 2025
- October - December 2024
- July - September 2024
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
April - June 2025 archive
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access
- The Largest Empires in the World's History

