SMSFs warned on NALE uncertainty
Heffron says SMSFs still need to be cautious around non-arm’s length arrangements.
Uncertainty over which SMSF arrangements will still be caught by NALE rules will remain until the legislation is amended, says Heffron technical specialist Lyn Formica.
After months of industry lobbying around the NALI/NALE rules, the government recently announced it will “amend the law to ensure it operates as intended”.
But Heffron’s head of technical and education services said clarification was needed in the meantime.
“Given the government’s commitment to finding a workable solution whilst still meeting NALI’s policy intent, during the consultation process we would be looking to gain clarity on the types of services which can be provided to SMSFs without triggering a NALI issue,” she said.
The amendments would need to identify whether the trustees of the unit trusts in which SMSFs invest can provide services to the trust without causing NALI issues.
SMSFs would also need to understand the ATO’s expectations where a fund purchases assets partly for cash and partly in specie.
Ms Formica said the amendments should also ensure the penalty for incurring NALE was proportionate to the mischief involved and that there was no NALI risk for funds given the government’s legislative changes were intended to apply from 1 July 2022, but the NALE provisions had application from 1 July 2018.
“Earlier this week, we did gain welcome clarity on one issue regarding NALI – the position for trustees who restructured their related party limit recourse borrowing arrangement in the lead up to 31 January 2017 to comply with PCG 2016/5,” she said.
“The ATO has now amended PCG 2016/5 to confirm that the commissioner will not seek to apply the NALI provisions to these arrangements for the 2018-19 and later years.
“Whilst the NALI/NALE story is not yet complete, thanks to the tireless lobbying of the various professional bodies and industry associations, it seems we are now on the path to finding a long-term pragmatic solution.”
Reporter
28 March 2022
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures