Another twist on the gender savings gap
Sometimes reality differs from what we intuitively suspect - quite often in regard to investments and savings. Take the superannuation of elderly retired females as an example.

Sometimes reality differs from what we intuitively suspect - quite often in regard to investments and savings. Take the superannuation of elderly retired females as an example.
Given the greater average longevity of women, we might jump to the conclusion that more retired females than males aged over 75 receive superannuation pensions.
Not so, says the latest Superannuation Market Projections Report published by consultants Rice Warner.
"This reflects past superannuation savings practices," the report states. "Women retiring with small balances tend to take lump sums or spend their pensions in the early years of retirement.
As other Rice Warner research confirms, women have lower average super savings throughout their working lives. And this gender savings gap rises significantly from age 35, in part because the majority of women take time out of the workforce to raise children.
Factors contributing to this gender savings inequality include the lower average incomes of women, lost promotions from women interrupting their careers to have children and the small proportion of women holding senior jobs. The list goes on.
In the 65-69 age group, an estimated 363,000 retired women were receiving super pensions as at June 2015 compared to 276,000 men. Yet in the 75 to 79 age group, an estimated 144,000 women were receiving super pensions against 193,000 men.
And the gap continues to broaden with age. For instance in the 80-84 age group, an estimated 58,000 women received a super pension compared to 100,000 men.
Aside from the critical issue of the gender inequality in super savings, a point worth emphasising is that the higher a fund member's balance, the more likely that a superannuation pension rather than a lump sum upon retirement. This is obviously regardless of gender.
The Senate Economics References Committee's current inquiry on economic security for women in retirement is due to report late next month.
By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
03 April 2016 | Retirement and superannuation
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Two Cautionary Tales About Resources Important to Anyone Using a Domain Name or Website
- Children as SMSF dependents very complex
- The three phases of retirement: Key decisions at every stage
- The retirement gap we don't talk about
- Retirees hardest hit by inflation
- IGR predicts drawdowns will be major source of retirement income
- Complex rules of small business CGT concessions can present challenges
- Check out the smartest species on earth: Data from 200M BC to 2026
- Five steps towards a more confident retirement
- Financial literacy in Australia: Where we're improving (and falling behind)
- CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair
- SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?
- How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise
- Super viewed as mortgage solution
- Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape
- Check out the largest castles by country
- ATO’s LRBA data significantly less than industry figures
- New deeming thresholds could deliver small part age pension
- Can I still get the Age Pension if my super is healthy?
- New to SMSFs? Start preparing for your first SAR lodgment
- Contribution splitting now more valuable
- Six ways Gen X can build retirement savings
- How to maximise the impact of your inheritance
- How Our Diets have Changed.
- Adequate retirement savings misjudged
Article archive
- July - September 2026
- April - June 2026
- January - March 2026
- October - December 2025
- July - September 2025
- April - June 2025
- January - March 2025
- October - December 2024
- July - September 2024
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022

