Another twist on the gender savings gap
Sometimes reality differs from what we intuitively suspect - quite often in regard to investments and savings. Take the superannuation of elderly retired females as an example.
Sometimes reality differs from what we intuitively suspect - quite often in regard to investments and savings. Take the superannuation of elderly retired females as an example.
Given the greater average longevity of women, we might jump to the conclusion that more retired females than males aged over 75 receive superannuation pensions.
Not so, says the latest Superannuation Market Projections Report published by consultants Rice Warner.
"This reflects past superannuation savings practices," the report states. "Women retiring with small balances tend to take lump sums or spend their pensions in the early years of retirement.
As other Rice Warner research confirms, women have lower average super savings throughout their working lives. And this gender savings gap rises significantly from age 35, in part because the majority of women take time out of the workforce to raise children.
Factors contributing to this gender savings inequality include the lower average incomes of women, lost promotions from women interrupting their careers to have children and the small proportion of women holding senior jobs. The list goes on.
In the 65-69 age group, an estimated 363,000 retired women were receiving super pensions as at June 2015 compared to 276,000 men. Yet in the 75 to 79 age group, an estimated 144,000 women were receiving super pensions against 193,000 men.
And the gap continues to broaden with age. For instance in the 80-84 age group, an estimated 58,000 women received a super pension compared to 100,000 men.
Aside from the critical issue of the gender inequality in super savings, a point worth emphasising is that the higher a fund member's balance, the more likely that a superannuation pension rather than a lump sum upon retirement. This is obviously regardless of gender.
The Senate Economics References Committee's current inquiry on economic security for women in retirement is due to report late next month.
By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
03 April 2016 | Retirement and superannuation
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access
- The Largest Empires in the World's History