Fresh SMSF documentation warnings surface
One lawyer has observed "significant" and increasing issues arising from SMSF documents that were not properly executed, resulting in "serious consequences" for the end client.

Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Arnold Bloch Leibler partner Clint Harding said the rise of automatically generated documentation has seen crucial details left out of the compliance process.
For example, these systems often do not take into account the details of the trust deed, which is increasingly resulting in problems with certain tax structures.
"I’ve got one on the go at the moment where trust distributions have been made for seven years to a company that has been wound up. So you see some strange things," Mr Harding added.
"There can be some pretty serious consequences if you distribute, or purport to distribute, income to a beneficiary who is either dead or has been wound up, that’s going to be ineligible and avoid distribution, and presumably that income will be taxed to the trustee at 49 per cent," he said.
Mr Harding said typically there isn’t a sinister element to these failures, rather, just holes in the compliance process.
"People just use last year’s documentation and change the date on it and away you go," he said.
Gadens partner Kathleen Conroy previously noted to SMSF Adviser the inherent danger in speedy access to important SMSF documentation.
"For the SMSF sector, modern technology enables, amongst other things, the setting up of funds in less than 15 minutes, the making and changing of investments in less time than it takes 'to boil the kettle’, and the gathering and disseminating of more words than any one person could read in a lifetime," she said.
"Speed, a lightened management load and access to information are not inherently evil – but in the world of self-managed super they are inherently dangerous," she added.
"The SMSF trustee can definitely benefit from the proper use of modern technology. But the SMSF trustee is legally bound to be engaged with the fund, to be thinking about long-term goals, and to be responding to individual circumstances rather than group trends," she said.
"There is an inherent tension between these legal drivers and the potentials of modern technology. If not properly respected, this tension can lead to real pain for the trustee and the assets of the fund."
By Katarina Taurian
Monday, 20 June
smsfadviseronline.com.au
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Five steps towards a more confident retirement
- Financial literacy in Australia: Where we're improving (and falling behind)
- CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair
- SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?
- How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise
- Super viewed as mortgage solution
- Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape
- Check out the largest castles by country
- ATO’s LRBA data significantly less than industry figures
- New deeming thresholds could deliver small part age pension
- Can I still get the Age Pension if my super is healthy?
- New to SMSFs? Start preparing for your first SAR lodgment
- Contribution splitting now more valuable
- Six ways Gen X can build retirement savings
- How to maximise the impact of your inheritance
- How Our Diets have Changed.
- Adequate retirement savings misjudged
- The SBSCH will close from 1 July 2026
- Complications of maintaining two cost bases in Div 296
- What the Payday Super changes mean for your retirement
- investment and economic outlook 2026
- Rules apply to gifting in superannuation
- Record SMSF growth driven by digital access
- The evolution of the world's languages
- Minimum pension drawdown not the only thing to consider as 30 June approaches
Article archive
- April - June 2026
- January - March 2026
- October - December 2025
- July - September 2025
- April - June 2025
- January - March 2025
- October - December 2024
- July - September 2024
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022

