Fresh SMSF documentation warnings surface
One lawyer has observed "significant" and increasing issues arising from SMSF documents that were not properly executed, resulting in "serious consequences" for the end client.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Arnold Bloch Leibler partner Clint Harding said the rise of automatically generated documentation has seen crucial details left out of the compliance process.
For example, these systems often do not take into account the details of the trust deed, which is increasingly resulting in problems with certain tax structures.
"I’ve got one on the go at the moment where trust distributions have been made for seven years to a company that has been wound up. So you see some strange things," Mr Harding added.
"There can be some pretty serious consequences if you distribute, or purport to distribute, income to a beneficiary who is either dead or has been wound up, that’s going to be ineligible and avoid distribution, and presumably that income will be taxed to the trustee at 49 per cent," he said.
Mr Harding said typically there isn’t a sinister element to these failures, rather, just holes in the compliance process.
"People just use last year’s documentation and change the date on it and away you go," he said.
Gadens partner Kathleen Conroy previously noted to SMSF Adviser the inherent danger in speedy access to important SMSF documentation.
"For the SMSF sector, modern technology enables, amongst other things, the setting up of funds in less than 15 minutes, the making and changing of investments in less time than it takes 'to boil the kettle’, and the gathering and disseminating of more words than any one person could read in a lifetime," she said.
"Speed, a lightened management load and access to information are not inherently evil – but in the world of self-managed super they are inherently dangerous," she added.
"The SMSF trustee can definitely benefit from the proper use of modern technology. But the SMSF trustee is legally bound to be engaged with the fund, to be thinking about long-term goals, and to be responding to individual circumstances rather than group trends," she said.
"There is an inherent tension between these legal drivers and the potentials of modern technology. If not properly respected, this tension can lead to real pain for the trustee and the assets of the fund."
By Katarina Taurian
Monday, 20 June
smsfadviseronline.com.au
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures