Lawyer warns on ‘adverse’ death taxes with insurance
An industry lawyer has urged SMSF practitioners to carefully scrutinise any life insurance arrangements .....
..... that flow through superannuation, with payments to non-dependants continuing to result in “adverse tax ramifications”.

Estate Planning Equation director Allan Swan says where the ownership of a life insurance policy is in a superannuation fund, SMSF practitioners need to think carefully about its tax ramifications.
“If we have life insurance that flows via a superannuation fund and out as death benefits, and it’s paid as a pension to say a surviving spouse, we don’t have adverse tax ramifications,” Mr Swan said.
In situations where it is paid to an estate and goes to a surviving spouse and young children, there are also no significant tax ramifications.
“[However], if it goes to non-dependants, non-dependants for tax purposes or it gets paid to a testamentary trust that includes non-independents, the ATO gets a 15 per cent death benefits tax by virtue of it being paid to the non-dependant, plus a 15 per cent surcharge because it’s coming out as an untaxed amount, plus any levies that might be applicable,” Mr Swan said.
“So we’ll see a tax bill of 34 per cent on life insurance coming via super being paid into an estate or being paid into a testamentary trust that includes say grandchildren, nieces and nephews – too wider class of beneficiaries.”
If a testamentary trust is being used and a super fund is involved, Mr Swan said SMSF practitioners should advise their clients to limit that to people who are death benefit dependant for the purposes of the Tax Act to ensure there is no taxation problem.
Typically, death benefit dependants are a surviving spouse and/or children who are either still minors or are still financially dependent or in an interdependency relationship.
“So if they fall into any or those categories, then the trust is limited to just those beneficiaries and can’t be widened, then we’ve got a trust that won’t expose people to death benefits tax,” Mr Swan said.
“There’s effectively a 30 per cent levy rate applying to life insurance funded death benefits. We’re talking about a very high tax rate historically, in terms of death duties.”
MIRANDA BROWNLEE
Monday, 22 August 2016
www.smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Super versus trusts: What is the best option with Div 296?
- Thinking of establishing an SMSF? Don’t skip reading the rules
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2026
- Coercive control in SMSF becoming a hot issue
- Are downsizer contributions losing steam?
- What to look for when choosing a financial adviser
- AI use needed with proper safeguards
- Most Reliable Car Brands in 2026
- ASIC targeting high-pressure sales and inappropriate advice
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2026
- Australians not underspending their super
- Five financial steps for the new year
- ASIC warns investors on pump and dump scammers
- Don’t confuse contribution with roll-over when using proceeds from small business sale
- Missed SG exemption may not be problem
- Rare and vanishing: Animals That May Go Extinct Soon
- It’s super hump month. Make the most of it
- Three timeless investing lessons from Warren Buffett
- 2026 outlook: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Care needed with ceased legacy pensions
- What had the biggest impact on the sector in 2025?
- What does 2026 look like in the SMSF sector?
- It’s not just Div 296 that could face changes in 2026
- Which country produces the most electricity annually?
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025

