How financial advice helps create wealth.
An article based on a 16 year study by Vanguard Investments Pty Ltd.

Last month I reported on a 16-year study by Vanguard Investments that found a financial adviser effectively adds around 3% to the value of a client’s portfolio over time.
The real significance of this is that you can have a finance professional take care of one of the most important jobs in your life (funding your retirement) for very little, if any, real cost. This can even be the case for those with smaller portfolios.
However, for many people the main problem is getting started and the cost is often seen as too high or the adviser focus can seem a bit too much on their needs rather than the client.
A major reason for this, unfortunately, is that increased regulation and monitoring has meant advisers have moved to a fee-based model and away from the commissions of yesteryear. This is a good outcome but it has meant advisers have had to increase entry costs which, in turn, has led many potential clients to see these costs as too high. A proverbial Catch 22.
It is because of this sort of conundrum that firms like Vanguard Investments have undertaken long term studies. The outcome from their work is that a WIN/WIN opportunity exists for all.
However, this benefit isn’t just from better investing, though that will often be the case. It’s the more holistic approach that wins the day. Vanguard Investments identify the following areas as those that will generate this positive outcome:
- Suitable asset allocation
- Cost-effective implementation (expense ratios)
- Rebalancing
- Behavioural coaching (Vanguard Investments found this to be the most significant contributor because there are some tasks people struggle with such as budgeting and expense management. Behavioural coaching addresses this issue).
- Tax efficiency (An example here is where an investor with a modest portfolio lost more than $250,000 in value over a 10-12 year period because they thought the three stock brokers they used were looking after tax related issues. They weren’t! If the planner had been involved sooner the outcomes would have been significantly different.)
- Total returns versus income investing.
Finally, the concerns many potential clients have over the cost of financial planning means they delay getting help early enough which, in turn, threatens the retirement outcomes they want to achieve.
Peter Graham
PlannerWeb / AcctWeb
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- AI exuberance: Economic upside, stock market downside
- Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered
- Investment and economic outlook, November 2025
- Move assets before death to avoid tax implications
- ATO issues warning about super schemes
- 12 financial tips for the festive season and year ahead
- Birth date impacts bring-forward NCCs
- Countries with the largest collection or eucalyptus trees
- How to budget using the envelope method
- Accountants united in support for changes
- Investment and economic outlook, October 2025
- Stress-test SMSF in preparation for Div 296
- Determining what is an in-house asset can help determine investment strategy
- Beware pushy sales tactics targeting your super
- Call for SMSF ‘nudge’ in DBFO package
- How Many Countries Divided From The Largest Empire throughout history
- How changes to deeming rates could affect your pension payments
- Five building blocks that could lead to a more confident retirement
- Investment and economic outlook, September 2025
- Caution needed if moving assets to children
- Evolution of ‘ageless workers’ sees retirement age rise
- Younger Australians expect more for their retirement
- New NALE guidance still has issues
- Airplane Fuel Consumption Per Minute
- How $1,000 plus regular contributions turned into $823,000 through compounding
- Common sense the best defence against fraudsters: forensic auditor

