Excess TBC issues surfacing with reduced pension account values
The ATO has expressed concern that some trustees with diminished pension account values may be putting themselves at risk of exceeding their transfer balance cap by commuting their pension and then topping it back up.
In a recent discussion with Smarter SMSF, ATO assistant commissioner, SMSF segment, Steve Keating said the ATO is worried that some trustees don’t fully understand how the credits and debits in their transfer balance account operate, which may expose them to potential transfer balance cap issues.
“We’re concerned that where we’ve seen the value of pension accounts reduce, that some trustees may be putting themselves at risk of exceeding the transfer balance cap by commuting to roll back and then top up their pension because they may not properly appreciate how the credits and debits in their transfer balance account operate,” he explained.
“Without getting too technical, if a member starts a pension valued at $1.5 million which is today now worth only $1.2 million and they wish to roll it back into accumulation phase so that they can top it up with, say, $300,000 that they still have in accumulation phase, if they start a new pension at $1.5 million, they’ll be in excess of their transfer balance cap by $200,000.”
Mr Keating said this means the trustee will have to commute the excess, plus any extra transfer balance earnings from the pension as well as pay excess transfer balance tax.
He also reminded SMSF professionals and trustees that where a pension is being commuted in part, trustees must ensure that sufficient assets remain to meet the minimum pension payment status for that year based on the original value of the income stream at the start of the year.
“Trustees have an obligation to ensure that the commencement and commutation of pensions is supported by contemporaneous records and that the payments have been correctly characterised to allow the SMSF auditors to ensure that the minimum pension payment status had been met,” he said.
“There are transfer balance cap as well as exempt current pension income consequences if a pension fails to meet the standards, and these can lead to more and more complex TBAR reporting obligations in the future.”
Miranda Brownlee
24 July 2020
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access