ATO ruling may offer solution to NALE issues
Amendments being made to contribution ruling TR 2010/1 may provide a fix to some of the significant issues with the non-arm’s length expenditure rules, said the SMSF Association.

Addressing the 2022 SMSF Association National Conference, SMSF Association deputy chief executive Peter Burgess said the changes to the non-arm’s length expenditure (NALE) rules would have much broader implications for the entire superannuation sector than was originally intended.
“In some circumstances, could result in all of the fund’s income being taxed at 45 per cent,” said Mr Burgess.
“Prior to the introduction of the NALE rules, we were certainly not coming across SMSF members who were undercharging for services provided to their fund as a deliberate strategy to circumvent the contribution caps or to artificially inflate the fund’s investment earnings.”
Mr Burgess said it is imperative that these rules are appropriately targeted and are fit for purpose.
“In our view, amendments are needed to exempt general expenses from these provisions, and ensure penalties only apply to expenditure shortfall amounts rather than to some or all of the fund’s income,” he explained.
Mr Burgess said it is the linking of the NALE to some or all of the fund’s income, and then applying penalties to that income, that could give rise to inappropriate and poorly targeted outcomes.
“Breaking this link and only penalising the shortfall amount is, in our view, an appropriately targeted legislative response,” he said.
“The penalty could be treating the shortfall amount as a taxable contribution or dealing with it through the contributions regime.
“So, the solution may well lie in the amendments the ATO are currently making to contribution ruling TR 2010/1, which is now expected to be released in the second half of 2022.”
Mr Burgess noted that the government had announced plans to amend the NALE rules to ensure they are operated as intended, an announcement that has been welcomed by the SMSF Association.
“We were pleased to see this announcement and we look forward to a bipartisan approach to addressing this issue and ensuring the rules work as intended”, he said.
Miranda Brownlee
26 April 2022
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Two Cautionary Tales About Resources Important to Anyone Using a Domain Name or Website
- Children as SMSF dependents very complex
- The three phases of retirement: Key decisions at every stage
- The retirement gap we don't talk about
- Retirees hardest hit by inflation
- IGR predicts drawdowns will be major source of retirement income
- Complex rules of small business CGT concessions can present challenges
- Check out the smartest species on earth: Data from 200M BC to 2026
- Five steps towards a more confident retirement
- Financial literacy in Australia: Where we're improving (and falling behind)
- CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair
- SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?
- How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise
- Super viewed as mortgage solution
- Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape
- Check out the largest castles by country
- ATO’s LRBA data significantly less than industry figures
- New deeming thresholds could deliver small part age pension
- Can I still get the Age Pension if my super is healthy?
- New to SMSFs? Start preparing for your first SAR lodgment
- Contribution splitting now more valuable
- Six ways Gen X can build retirement savings
- How to maximise the impact of your inheritance
- How Our Diets have Changed.
- Adequate retirement savings misjudged
- The SBSCH will close from 1 July 2026
Article archive
- July - September 2026
- April - June 2026
- January - March 2026
- October - December 2025
- July - September 2025
- April - June 2025
- January - March 2025
- October - December 2024
- July - September 2024
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022

