ATO ruling may offer solution to NALE issues
Amendments being made to contribution ruling TR 2010/1 may provide a fix to some of the significant issues with the non-arm’s length expenditure rules, said the SMSF Association.
Addressing the 2022 SMSF Association National Conference, SMSF Association deputy chief executive Peter Burgess said the changes to the non-arm’s length expenditure (NALE) rules would have much broader implications for the entire superannuation sector than was originally intended.
“In some circumstances, could result in all of the fund’s income being taxed at 45 per cent,” said Mr Burgess.
“Prior to the introduction of the NALE rules, we were certainly not coming across SMSF members who were undercharging for services provided to their fund as a deliberate strategy to circumvent the contribution caps or to artificially inflate the fund’s investment earnings.”
Mr Burgess said it is imperative that these rules are appropriately targeted and are fit for purpose.
“In our view, amendments are needed to exempt general expenses from these provisions, and ensure penalties only apply to expenditure shortfall amounts rather than to some or all of the fund’s income,” he explained.
Mr Burgess said it is the linking of the NALE to some or all of the fund’s income, and then applying penalties to that income, that could give rise to inappropriate and poorly targeted outcomes.
“Breaking this link and only penalising the shortfall amount is, in our view, an appropriately targeted legislative response,” he said.
“The penalty could be treating the shortfall amount as a taxable contribution or dealing with it through the contributions regime.
“So, the solution may well lie in the amendments the ATO are currently making to contribution ruling TR 2010/1, which is now expected to be released in the second half of 2022.”
Mr Burgess noted that the government had announced plans to amend the NALE rules to ensure they are operated as intended, an announcement that has been welcomed by the SMSF Association.
“We were pleased to see this announcement and we look forward to a bipartisan approach to addressing this issue and ensuring the rules work as intended”, he said.
Miranda Brownlee
26 April 2022
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
- Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
- SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
- Trustees warned on early access