Paperwork bungles lead to $38k in payments
An example of the need to keep good records for everything you do.

Back office and paperwork bungles have seen several workers given $38,000 in unpaid wages and entitlements, as the regulator sounds alarm bells on its monitoring of “the intricacies of our workplace laws.”
The workers were based in the Newcastle and Hunter region of NSW, and were victims of poor compliance practices and checks of their employers.
In one matter, a young labourer in Lake Macquarie was back-paid $25,220 after he was underpaid as a result of being incorrectly classified as an apprentice.
Essentially, it was agreed the labourer would commence an apprenticeship, but the employer failed to properly complete the paperwork and registration process required to enter into a formal training arrangement.
Consequently, the labourer was paid lower rates than he was entitled to, and the employer had not taken the appropriate steps to ensure compliance.
“Employers must be aware that we are prepared to take enforcement action in response to reckless, deliberate or repeated breaches of pay and record keeping laws,” said Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James.
“We conduct follow-up audits of businesses previously found to be non-compliant to make sure they have changed their ways. Repeat offenders can expect to be subject to serious enforcement action including potential litigation.
“In our experience many businesses are overconfident when it comes to the intricacies of our workplace laws, however we will be taking an increasingly hard line with employers who have significant compliance issues and cannot demonstrate that they made a diligent effort to understand what award or industrial instrument applies to their workplace, what the correct classification for their employees is, and what minimum pay rates apply.”
By: Staff Reporter
04 OCTOBER 2017
accountantsdaily.com.au
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- SMSF commercial property owners and Div 296 ‘misconceptions’
- 7 simple steps to get on the investment ladder
- Can I access my super early?
- Magnificent Seven: More diverse than they may appear
- Look for the red flags that signal unscrupulous advice
- Carer responsibilities don’t meet interdependency criteria: PBR
- LRBA stability has been understated
- From Bricks to iPhones: The Evolution of the Telephone
- Interest rates likely to stay higher for longer
- Iran conflict: Keeping perspective on market risk
- Most Valuable Industries in the World 2026
- In turbulent times, stick to your long-term wealth strategy
- SMSF trustees acting badly – further disqualification cases
- Know the difference between death benefit pension and normal pension or pay the price
- View Division 296 as two-stage event
- Rise in SMSF inflows indicate more people are moving into the sector
- Super versus trusts: What is the best option with Div 296?
- Thinking of establishing an SMSF? Don’t skip reading the rules
- Investment and economic outlook, February 2026
- Coercive control in SMSF becoming a hot issue
- Are downsizer contributions losing steam?
- What to look for when choosing a financial adviser
- AI use needed with proper safeguards
- Most Reliable Car Brands in 2026
- ASIC targeting high-pressure sales and inappropriate advice
- Investment and economic outlook, January 2026
- Australians not underspending their super
- Five financial steps for the new year
- ASIC warns investors on pump and dump scammers
- Don’t confuse contribution with roll-over when using proceeds from small business sale
- Missed SG exemption may not be problem
- Rare and vanishing: Animals That May Go Extinct Soon
Article archive

