Challenges with TBC increase for those in pension phase
The increase in the transfer balance cap from $1.9 million to $2 million is not as simple as it seems, particularly for members already in pension phase, a leading adviser has said.
.
David Busoli, principal of SMSF Alliance, said on the latest SMSF Adviser podcast that for those members just starting their pension, the transfer balance cap (TBC) increase is “nice and simple”, and they start at $2 million.
“However, for those who have had a pension before and haven’t used up the whole of the cap at the time, you can take into account this indexation, but not to the extent that you might think,” Busoli said.
“The TBC hasn’t really gone from $1.9 million to $2 million at all.”
He gave an example of a member who had started a pension or a series of pensions before 1 July 2025 that equated to a starting balance of $950,000, which is 50 per cent of the $1.9 million balance cap that applied up until the end of last year.
“That member has used 50 per cent of that cap when the $100,000 indexation came in; they only get 50 per cent of that value,” he said.
“So, they have only gone up 50 per cent of the $100,000, which is $50,000. Then, when you consider that that calculation is applied to everyone who has an existing pension, you would be hard-pressed to find two people in the country who have exactly the same amount of transfer balance account used,” he said.
“It means that every single person with an existing pension has a different transfer balance cap.”
Aaron Dunn, CEO of Smarter SMSF, said the challenges begin as it is not simply a matter of looking at the indexation at a point in time, but is now necessary to reflect on the history of that TBC to look at not only the amounts that have gone in but also those that have gone out.
“That’s where the fun and games begin because you need to have accuracy in that data to ensure that the amount that you can get indexation by is actually correct,” Dunn said.
“What we see is that it is only as good as the information that’s in there, and we know SMSFs have a very different time frame to what industry funds do. So, both in terms of what the requirement is under law and then probably what practically happens as well is even further stretched there.”
Busoli added that there are two factors that must be considered when determining the TBC.
“One is whether the record that the government holds is correct, and two is, what is the record?” he said.
“If you look at the first part, the government will only record what it’s given, and in the case of SMSFs, a fund only has to lodge a transfer balance report within 28 days of the end of each quarter. So, as pensions are commuted or commenced, there’s no immediacy with which that information can necessarily go to the government.”
He added that even if an SMSF fulfils its requirement within that 28 days, there is a challenge in locating that information from the government.
“The biggest single problem that we have as SMSF administrators, and I’m sure the biggest single problem that financial planners have in terms of accurately advising their clients is a lack of information because we are unable to access the information of any of the members of any of our funds unless we also act for them in a personal taxation capacity,” he said.
“We don’t act as personal tax agents. We only do SMSF administration, and there are many SMSF administrators around the traps that just do that. So, the only way that we can get that information is by asking the member. Similarly, the financial planner can only do that as well.”
Keeli Cambourne
July 21 2025
smsfadviser.com
Latest eNewsletters
Hot Issues
- How financial advice can reduce stress and save time
- How personal data could boost your retirement income by up to 50%
- Investment and economic outlook, July 2025
- ATO flags October SAR lodgment date
- Death benefits not reliant on probate
- Challenges with TBC increase for those in pension phase
- Avoid LRBA structure short cuts
- The rise and fall of the world’s largest economies | GDP Epic Battle (1560–2025)
- Div 296 sparking death benefit discussions
- ATO warns SMSF trustees to be aware of increase in scams
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Beware of tax implications for failing to meet minimum pension requirements: consultant
- Leasing property owned by an SMSF
- A super contributions deadline you won’t want to miss
- How topping up your super each year could leave you $80,000 better off in retirement
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
- ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
- Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
- Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
- Your 30 June superannuation checklist
- Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
- New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
- Comparison of various Animal Weight
- $95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
- Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
- Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
- Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
- How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
- Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
- Financial abuse move now a certainty
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025